Event

Jun 14, 2023
Roundtable: The Securitization, Moralization, and Idealization of Academic Cooperation with the PRC

A few years ago, university and research organizations in Europe and North-America proudly displayed their academic relations and institutional cooperation with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as an asset and an achievement. Sentiments now, however, seem to have shifted dramatically, and the same institutions and individuals are more at risk of being labelled naïve, and in some cases unprincipled, in public discourse, for upholding strong ties to China. While in the US debate, security issues play the biggest role in rethinking academic partnerships and research cooperation, in Europe, institutions are so far mainly concerned by threats to academic freedom, it seems.

What caused these shifts? What different perspectives are there in the debate? What kind of evidence do actors in academia and in science politics possess to evaluate the situation and gauge the risks and opportunities of an engagement with partners in the PRC? What recalibrations have already been tried? And is this now really a new phase in global science relations, or are these normal oscillations under the influence of geopolitical dynamics? In this roundtable discussion, we will explore these developments and questions with the expertise and first-hand insights from four renowned scholars and seek to identify nuances in what seems to be an otherwise increasingly polarized debate.

Biography

Address
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
Room
Zoom/Online Meeting Platform
Contact and Registration

Please register at the following link: 
https://zoom.us/j/91890610657?pwd=SVpxbkZWQ3ZrNlhIWHlQSnZXRzR2UT09

This event is part of the LMRG & BCCN Lecture Series "China—The New Science Superpower?" For further information about the series, specific sessions, or questions concerning registration, please contact office-ahlers@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de.

About This Series

China’s push to become a leading science power is unprecedented in its speed, scope and, arguably, success. Reactions to China’s rise in global science are dichotomous: some anticipate that science made in China may come to dominate global academia while others deem it impossible to achieve scientific leadership under an authoritarian regime. A focus on rankings and statistics alone is apparently not enough to grasp the origins, characteristics, and the possible futures of China as a science superpower.

This monthly lecture series will bring together fresh empirical insights and intriguing theoretical reflections about the development of the science system in the People’s Republic of China and its global integration. Representing a variety of social science perspectives, our guest speakers will explore the evolution of Chinese science policy, interactions of societal norms and values and academia in the PRC, factors that enable or constrain scientific innovation, the global reception of scientific output and investment from China, the securitization of international collaboration, and much more.

BCCN Series Poster
2023-06-14T14:00:00SAVE IN I-CAL 2023-06-14 14:00:00 2023-06-14 15:30:00 Roundtable: The Securitization, Moralization, and Idealization of Academic Cooperation with the PRC Watch this roundtable on YouTube A few years ago, university and research organizations in Europe and North-America proudly displayed their academic relations and institutional cooperation with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as an asset and an achievement. Sentiments now, however, seem to have shifted dramatically, and the same institutions and individuals are more at risk of being labelled naïve, and in some cases unprincipled, in public discourse, for upholding strong ties to China. While in the US debate, security issues play the biggest role in rethinking academic partnerships and research cooperation, in Europe, institutions are so far mainly concerned by threats to academic freedom, it seems. What caused these shifts? What different perspectives are there in the debate? What kind of evidence do actors in academia and in science politics possess to evaluate the situation and gauge the risks and opportunities of an engagement with partners in the PRC? What recalibrations have already been tried? And is this now really a new phase in global science relations, or are these normal oscillations under the influence of geopolitical dynamics? In this roundtable discussion, we will explore these developments and questions with the expertise and first-hand insights from four renowned scholars and seek to identify nuances in what seems to be an otherwise increasingly polarized debate. Biography Zuoyue Wang Zuoyue Wang is a professor of history at the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, specializing in science, technology, and politics in modern US, China, and transnational contexts. Born in China and originally trained in physics, he received his PhD from UC Santa Barbara and published In Sputnik’s Shadow: The President’s Science Advisory Committee and Cold War America (2008; Chinese translation in 2011). He is currently studying the history of Chinese American scientists and US-China scientific relations, for which he received a grant from the National Science Foundation in 2010–2014. He was elected a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2019. Marcus Conlé Marcus Conlé is a research fellow at Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY. He is the coordinator of the project WIKOOP-INFRA that develops recommendations for handling cooperation with China at large research infrastructures. He is also an associate at the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA), where he co-authors the Asia Pacific Research Area (APRA) Performance Monitoring reports commissioned by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Marcus has done extensive research on China’s regional and sectoral innovation systems in Bremen and Duisburg. He studied Area Studies/China in Cologne and Dalian and completed his doctorate at the Mercator School of Management, University of Duisburg-Essen. Katrin Kinzelbach Katrin Kinzelbach is professor of political science at FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, visiting professor at King’s College London, and an associated project manager at the V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, where she focuses on the word-wide assessment of academic freedom. Kinzelbach is engaged in various committees on the same topic, for example the Academic Freedom Committee of the International Studies Association. Before joining FAU, Kinzelbach was associate director of the Global Public Policy Institute, and visiting professor at Central European University in Budapest. She spent her postdoc years in Hangzhou, China (2011–2012). Kinzelbach is interested in understanding how Chinese universities operate in the context of heightened political control.  Tommy Shih Tommy Shih is an Associate Professor in Business Administration at Lund University and a Senior Adviser at the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT). In 2021–2022 he was a Senior Adviser at the Swedish National China Center established by the Swedish government and served as an expert in the areas of science, technology and industry. His research on global science and geopolitics (www.globalsciencechallenges.com) and on innovation management. At STINT he is in charge of leading the work on responsible internationalization focusing on managing research security, integrity and responsibility. The initiative is done in close collaboration with international funding agencies and partnerships such as NSF (US), the Swedish Research Council, and Japan Science and Technology Agency.  Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany Zoom/Online Meeting Platform Europe/Berlin public